Do you want to conduct the Card Sorting Exercise (UX) with your teams?
Card sorting is a method used in information architecture design to help researchers understand how people categorize information. This user experience technique reveals the mental models of your participants. It ensures that the structure of your website or application matches the way users think. By organizing topics into categories that make sense to them, users provide direct input into the navigation flow. This reduces friction in the final product.
In this article, let’s see how you can effectively facilitate this powerful exercise with your teams.
Here is an overview of the sections in this article:
- The primary objectives of the card sorting activity.
- Five variations of the exercise to suit different needs.
- Essential tips for successful facilitation.
- Frequently asked questions about the activity.
Objective of the Activity
The primary goal of card sorting is to bridge the gap between designer assumptions and user reality. It serves as a foundational research step before high-fidelity prototyping begins.
Here are the key objectives that this exercise aims to achieve for your UX projects.
Uncovering User Mental Models
The most critical objective is discovering how your users perceive the relationship between different pieces of content. Designers often group items based on technical architecture or internal company structure. Users, however, navigate based on their own logic and needs. By observing how participants group cards, you gain a window into their cognitive processes. This insight allows you to build a structure that feels intuitive rather than confusing.
Establishing Effective Information Architecture
Building a robust information architecture (IA) requires more than just guessing what goes where. This activity provides data-backed evidence to support your structural decisions. It moves the conversation from subjective opinions to objective user input. You can confidently organize site maps and navigation menus knowing they align with user expectations. This leads to a product that is easier to navigate.
Refining Nomenclature and Labeling
Labels are often a source of confusion in digital products. What a business calls “Procurement” might be “Buying Stuff” to a user. This exercise helps you validate your terminology. You can see if the names on the cards make sense to the participants. If users struggle to categorize a card, the label might be unclear. This objective ensures that your language connects with your audience.
Identifying Ambiguity and Redundancy
Content audits can be tedious, but card sorting makes them interactive. Through this process, you quickly identify content that does not fit anywhere. You also spot items that could belong in multiple categories. This highlights ambiguity in your content strategy. It also reveals redundant topics that confuse users. Addressing these issues early saves time during the development phase.
Building Team Consensus
When stakeholders disagree on where content should live, this activity acts as a tie-breaker. It brings the team together around user data. Instead of arguing over personal preferences, the team focuses on the patterns that emerge from the sort. This objective fosters collaboration and aligns the team toward a user-centric goal.
5 Variations of the Card Sorting Exercise in UX
Here are 5 variations of the UX card sorting exercise designed to fit different research goals and team dynamics.
#1. Classic Open Card Sort
This is the standard version of the activity where participants organize topics into groups that make sense to them. They are then free to name these categories whatever they feel is appropriate.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Index cards with topics, sticky notes, markers, and large table or wall
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Prepare a deck of index cards where each card represents a piece of content or functionality within your system.
- Ask each team to review the cards and group them together based on similarity or logic. For example, they might group “Contact Us,” “Support,” and “FAQ” together because they relate to help.
- Request that the participants create a label for each group using a sticky note to describe the category.
Debrief
- What was the most difficult card to place in a group?
- Did everyone agree on the category names immediately? If so, why?
- How did you decide to handle items that seemed to fit in two places?
You can also read:
50 Easy Team Building Activities (Workplace)
#2. Closed Card Sort
In this variation, the categories are pre-determined by the researchers before the session begins. Participants are restricted to sorting the content cards into these specific buckets.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Pre-labeled category envelopes or headers, content cards, and table
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Set up the workspace with clear headings for your existing or proposed main navigation categories.
- Instruct the teams to sort the loose content cards into the category where they would expect to find them. For instance, ask them to decide if “Reset Password” belongs under “Account Settings” or “Security.”
- Observe any hesitation or debate when a card does not seem to fit into any of the pre-set buckets.
Debrief
- Which categories felt too broad or too narrow?
- Were there any cards that did not fit into the provided categories? If so, why?
- Which bucket filled up the fastest during the sort?
#3. Hybrid Card Sort
This version combines the structure of a closed sort with the flexibility of an open sort. It allows you to validate existing categories while leaving room for new user-generated ideas.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Content cards, pre-labeled headers, blank sticky notes, and markers
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Provide a set of pre-defined categories to start the exercise, but explicitly tell participants they are not final.
- Encourage each team to create new categories if they feel a card does not fit the existing labels. For example, if “Blog” does not fit into “Resources,” they can create a new “News” header.
- Ask the teams to rename any pre-set category if they believe the current name is confusing or inaccurate.
Debrief
- How many new categories did you feel compelled to create?
- Did the pre-existing labels help or hinder your sorting process? If so, why?
- Which original category name did you change and why?
#4. Reverse Card Sort (Tree Testing)
This variation flips the script by testing the findability of content within a structure rather than the creation of the structure. It validates whether users can actually find specific items in your proposed hierarchy.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: A printed site map or hierarchy tree, and task cards describing specific items
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Present the teams with a complete site structure or menu hierarchy visible on a wall or board.
- Give the participants specific tasks or items they need to “find” within that structure. For instance, hand them a card that says “Find the return policy” and watch where they look first.
- Record whether they chose the correct path immediately or if they had to backtrack.
Debrief
- Which task was the hardest to locate in the structure?
- Did the label names lead you to the right place effectively? If so, why?
- Where did you instinctively want to look for the item versus where it was located?
#5. Picture Card Sort
This visual variation replaces text-based topics with images or icons to understand visual associations. It is particularly useful for designing interfaces that rely heavily on iconography or for participants with literacy barriers.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Cards with icons or photos, blank paper for grouping, and markers
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Distribute a deck of cards that features symbols, icons, or screenshots instead of written words.
- Ask the participants to group the visuals based on functional similarity or aesthetic theme. For example, they might group a magnifying glass icon with a filter icon because both relate to search.
- Have each team label the groups based on the function they believe the images represent.
Debrief
- Were any images interpreted differently by different team members? If so, why?
- Which icons were the most difficult to categorize?
- Did the visual style influence your grouping more than the implied function? If so, why?
Want Some Unique Leadership Development Activities?
If you want some unique activities to equip your employees (both in-person & virtual) with leadership skills, qualities, and mindset, you can get my premium e-book:
Or Want Some Unique Team Building Activities?
If you want some unique activities for your employees (both in-person & virtual), you can get my premium e-book:
Tips for Successful Facilitation
Running a smooth card sorting exercise in UX requires more than just handing out cards. You must create an environment where participants feel comfortable sharing their honest thoughts.
Here are some essential tips to ensure your session yields high-quality data.
Limit the Number of Cards
One common mistake is overwhelming participants with too much information. If you include every single page of a large website, the activity becomes tedious. Participants will succumb to fatigue. When fatigue sets in, they stop thinking critically about the groupings. Aim for 30 to 50 cards maximum. This range provides enough data for analysis without burning out your team. If you have more content, split it into separate sessions.
Be a Neutral Observer
Your role is to facilitate the process, not to influence the outcome. It is tempting to correct participants when they group things “wrong.” You must resist this urge. There are no wrong answers in this activity. If a participant asks where a card belongs, throw the question back to them. Ask them where they would expect to find it. Your neutrality ensures the data reflects their mental model, not yours.
Encourage Thinking Aloud
The final grouping is important, but the conversation that leads to it is even more valuable. You want to understand the “why” behind the decisions. Ask teams to vocalize their thought process as they work. Hearing them debate whether an item is “Marketing” or “Sales” reveals ambiguity. This verbal feedback provides context that the data alone cannot show. It helps you distinguish between a confident decision and a guess.
Standardize Your Materials
Ensure that all your cards look identical in terms of size and font. Subtle differences can bias the results. For example, if some cards have bold text, users might think they are headings. If some are handwritten and others printed, it creates an unintended hierarchy. Use a template to print your cards. Uniformity ensures that participants focus only on the meaning of the words. This leads to cleaner data.
Record the Session
Taking notes during a fast-paced session is difficult. You might miss subtle interactions or quick comments. Use a video camera or an audio recorder to capture the full session. This allows you to revisit the discussion later. You can observe body language and hesitation that you missed in the moment. Reviewing the recording helps you catch nuances that might change your design approach. It also provides evidence to show stakeholders.
Final Words
Card sorting is an invaluable tool for aligning your digital product with the user’s mindset. It exposes the hidden logic that your customers use to navigate the world. By incorporating this exercise into your UX process, you reduce the risk of costly structural changes later. You also empower your team to make decisions based on evidence rather than assumptions. Start small with a classic sort and evolve as your needs grow.
FAQ: Card Sorting Exercise UX
You might have these questions in mind.
Why is card sorting important for UX?
It is crucial because it eliminates guesswork from the design process. Designers often assume they know how users think, but they are frequently wrong. This method provides concrete evidence of how real people categorize information. It results in a product that is intuitive and easy to use.
What is the difference between open and closed sorting?
Open sorting allows users to create their own category names. This is best for generative research when you are starting from scratch. Closed sorting forces users to put items into pre-existing categories. This is best for evaluative research to test if a current structure works.
How many participants do I need for this exercise?
For a qualitative insight during a team workshop, 3 to 5 groups are sufficient. If you are looking for statistical significance, you generally need 15 to 30 individual participants. Larger numbers help you see strong patterns in the data. Small groups are better for deep qualitative understanding.
Can I do this activity remotely?
Yes, there are many digital tools available that facilitate remote sorting. These tools allow you to send a link to participants anywhere in the world. However, you miss out on the “thinking aloud” aspect unless you combine it with a video call. In-person sessions often yield richer qualitative data.
How long should a card sorting session last?
The sorting activity itself should not exceed 20 minutes to avoid fatigue. However, the entire workshop including the introduction and debrief might take 30 minutes to an hour. Keep the energy high and the pace moving. If the session drags on, the quality of the results will suffer.