Fishbowl Discussion Activity for Teams (With Debrief)

Do you want to conduct the fishbowl discussion activity with your teams?

The fishbowl discussion is an engaging activity rooted in active listening principles. It encourages a small group to discuss a topic while a larger group observes, creating a focused, dynamic conversation. This structure promotes deeper understanding plus respectful dialogue among participants.

In this article, let’s see how to conduct this activity with your teams.

Here is an overview of the sections in this article:

• The primary objectives of the fishbowl discussion activity.

• Five different variations of the activity, including the classic version.

• Tips for facilitating a successful session.

• Frequently asked questions about the activity.

Objective of the Activity

The fishbowl discussion is more than just a conversation method; it is a structured exercise designed to achieve specific communication goals. It helps teams explore complex topics in a controlled and productive manner.

Here are the key objectives of this activity.

Promotes Active Listening

The core structure of the fishbowl activity inherently fosters active listening. The outer circle participants must listen carefully to the inner circle’s discussion to understand the perspectives being shared. This focused observation allows them to process information without the immediate pressure to respond. It trains individuals to absorb content, identify key points, and reflect on different viewpoints before formulating their own thoughts.

Encourages Deeper Dialogue

With only a few people speaking at a time, the fishbowl method allows for a more in-depth exploration of a topic. The inner circle can delve into nuances that might be lost in a larger, unstructured group discussion. Participants feel more comfortable sharing detailed thoughts, as they have the floor without constant interruption. This focused environment prevents the conversation from becoming superficial or fragmented.

Balances Participation

In many meetings, a few dominant voices can overshadow others. The fishbowl activity helps to level the playing field. By rotating participants into the inner circle, it provides a dedicated space for quieter team members to speak. The structured format ensures that everyone has an opportunity to contribute to the central discussion.

Develops Empathy and Perspective-Taking

Observing a conversation from the outside offers a unique vantage point. Participants in the outer circle can see the verbal and non-verbal dynamics of the discussion. They witness how different arguments are presented and received. This observational role helps build empathy, as they can better understand the emotional and logical underpinnings of their colleagues’ perspectives.

Provides a Model for Civil Discourse

The fishbowl activity serves as a practical model for conducting respectful and productive conversations. The clear rules and structure teach participants how to engage in dialogue without descending into unproductive arguments. The facilitator ensures that the discussion remains focused and civil. Teams learn how to disagree constructively, build upon each other’s ideas, and maintain a collaborative spirit even when discussing contentious topics.

5 Variations of the Fishbowl Activity

Here are 5 variations of the fishbowl discussion exercise that you can use with your teams.

#1. The Classic Fishbowl

This is the standard version of the activity, where a small inner circle discusses a topic while a larger outer circle observes. The roles are fixed for the duration of the discussion round.

Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Chairs for all participants
Participants: At least 6 people per group

Instructions

• Arrange an inner circle of chairs for the speakers and an outer circle for the observers. Ask a small group of volunteers to sit in the inner circle to begin the discussion.

• The inner group discusses a specific topic or question for a set amount of time. For instance, they might debate the pros and cons of a new project proposal.

• The outer group’s role is to listen actively and take notes, but they cannot speak.

• After the time is up, the facilitator can open the floor for a full group discussion or swap the inner and outer circles for another round.

Debrief

• What new perspectives did you gain from listening to the inner circle?

• How did being an observer, rather than a participant, change your understanding of the topic?

• What was the most compelling point made during the discussion, and why?

#2. The Open Chair Fishbowl

This variation allows for more dynamic participation, as observers can join the conversation by moving into an empty seat in the inner circle.

Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Chairs for all participants
Participants: At least 6 people per group

Instructions

• Set up the inner circle with one empty chair. The outer circle observes as usual.

• An inner circle member discusses the topic. Any observer who wishes to speak can come forward and occupy the empty chair.

• When an observer takes the empty seat, someone from the inner circle must volunteer to leave and join the outer circle, freeing up a chair again. For example, if a marketing team member wants to add a point, they take the empty seat, and a member from the current discussion group returns to the outer circle.

• The discussion continues with a fluid rotation of participants.

Debrief

• What motivated you to join the inner circle discussion?

• How did the constant rotation of speakers affect the flow of the conversation?

• Did you feel that all important viewpoints were able to be heard with this format? If so, why?

#3. The Panelist Fishbowl

This version positions the inner circle as a panel of experts who are questioned by the outer circle. It is great for knowledge sharing.

Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Chairs, notepads, and pens
Participants: At least 6 people per group

Instructions

• Select a few team members with expertise on a certain topic to sit in the inner circle. These individuals act as a panel.

• The outer circle participants are responsible for asking the panel questions. They cannot debate among themselves.

• The panelists in the inner circle answer the questions and can discuss the points among themselves. For instance, the outer circle might ask about the technical challenges of a new software implementation.

• The facilitator helps moderate the Q&A, ensuring the questions stay on topic.

Debrief

• What was the most insightful question asked, and what did the answer reveal?

• For the panelists: How did it feel to be positioned as the experts on this topic?

• For the questioners: Did the panel’s answers clarify your understanding of the subject and why?

#4. The Silent Fishbowl

In this reflective variation, the inner circle communicates non-verbally or through writing, while the outer circle observes their interactions.

Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Large paper or whiteboard, and markers
Participants: At least 6 people per group

Instructions

• Place a large sheet of paper or a small whiteboard in the center of the inner circle.

• The inner circle participants are given a prompt to respond to, but they can only communicate by writing or drawing on the shared space. No talking is allowed.

• The outer circle observes the silent conversation unfolding. For example, the prompt could be “What is the biggest obstacle to our team’s success?” and participants write their ideas.

• After a set time, the facilitator leads a verbal debrief with the entire group, discussing the written contributions and the experience of silent collaboration.

Debrief

• What was it like to communicate without speaking?

• How did the absence of verbal cues change the way you interpreted others’ ideas?

• What themes or patterns emerged from the written discussion?

#5. The Debate Fishbowl

This format structures the discussion as a formal debate between two opposing viewpoints, with the outer circle acting as judges.

Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Chairs for all participants
Participants: At least 6 people per group

Instructions

• Divide the inner circle into two teams, each representing an opposing side of an issue.

• Each team gets a set amount of time to present their arguments, followed by a period for rebuttal. For instance, one team could argue for a four-day work week, while the other argues against it.

• The outer circle listens to both sides of the debate. They are not allowed to interject.

• After the debate, the outer circle can vote on which side presented a more convincing argument or share which points they found most persuasive.

Debrief

• Which argument did you find most convincing, and why?

• How did the debate format help clarify the key issues on both sides?

• Did hearing the structured arguments change your initial opinion on the topic, and why?

Want Some Unique Leadership Development Activities?

If you want some unique activities to equip your employees (both in-person and virtual) with leadership skills, qualities, and mindset, you can get my premium e-book:

The Empowering Guide of Unique Leadership Development Activities: 100 Fully Customizable Exercises That You Can Conduct with Any Group of Employees, Anywhere

Or Want Some Unique Team Building Activities?

If you want some unique activities for your employees (both in-person and virtual), you can get my premium e-book:

The Busy Leader’s Guide of Unique Team Building Activities: 30 Fully Customizable Exercises That You Can Conduct with Any Group of Employees, Anywhere

Tips for Successful Facilitation

Facilitating a fishbowl discussion requires a delicate balance of structure and flexibility. A great facilitator guides the conversation without controlling it.

Here are some tips to help you run a smooth and productive session.

Set Clear Expectations

Before the activity begins, clearly explain the purpose and rules of the fishbowl. Make sure everyone understands the roles of the inner and outer circles. Clarify the specific topic for discussion, the time limits for each round, and the protocol for swapping participants if you are using a variation like the open chair. This initial setup prevents confusion and ensures that participants feel comfortable and prepared. When everyone knows what is expected of them, the activity is more likely to run smoothly and achieve its intended objectives.

Choose a Compelling Topic

The success of a fishbowl discussion heavily depends on the topic. It should be relevant and engaging for all participants. A good topic is complex enough to warrant a deep discussion but not so divisive that it creates hostility. It should invite multiple perspectives rather than a simple yes or no answer. For example, instead of asking “Should we change our marketing strategy?” try “What are the potential opportunities and risks of shifting our marketing strategy toward a new demographic?” This encourages nuanced conversation instead of a polarized debate.

Manage Time Effectively

Adhering to time limits is crucial for keeping the discussion focused and ensuring that everyone gets a chance to participate. Use a visible timer to track the discussion rounds. Announce when time is halfway through and when it is nearly up. This helps the speakers in the inner circle to manage their contributions and ensures the conversation does not get stuck on a single point. Strict time management also respects the participants’ schedules and maintains the momentum of the activity. It keeps the energy high and prevents the discussion from dragging on.

Intervene Mindfully

As a facilitator, your role is to guide, not to dominate. Intervene only when necessary. You might need to step in if the conversation veers off-topic, if one person is monopolizing the discussion, or if the dialogue becomes disrespectful. Your interventions should be brief and aimed at redirecting the conversation back to its intended course. For example, you could say, “That’s an interesting point, but let’s return to the main question” or “Let’s make sure we hear from others in the circle.” Your goal is to create a safe and productive space for others to speak.

Guide a Strong Debrief

The learning from a fishbowl activity is cemented during the debrief session. This is where participants reflect on both the content of the discussion and the process itself. Use open-ended questions to guide this reflection. Ask the outer circle about their observations and the inner circle about their experience. Inquire about key takeaways, surprising viewpoints, and how the discussion felt. A well-facilitated debrief helps participants connect the dots, internalize new insights, and consider how to apply their learning to future teamwork and communication.

Final Words

The fishbowl discussion is a versatile and powerful tool for team communication. It enhances active listening while promoting deeper dialogue. This activity balances participation, ensuring all voices have a chance to be heard. By modeling civil discourse, it builds empathy and strengthens team cohesion. Implementing this structured conversation method can transform your team meetings into more inclusive, insightful, and productive sessions.

FAQ: Fishbowl Discussion Activity

You might have these questions in mind.

What is the ideal group size for a fishbowl activity?

The ideal size can vary, but a group of 15 to 30 people works very well. This allows for a small inner circle of 3-5 speakers and a sizable outer circle of observers. The activity can be adapted for smaller or larger groups by adjusting the size of the inner circle.

How do you select the first group for the inner circle?

You can ask for volunteers to start the discussion, which often brings forward those most passionate about the topic. Alternatively, you can pre-select a diverse group to ensure a range of perspectives from the outset. For a more random approach, you could draw names.

Can the fishbowl activity be done virtually?

Yes, it can be adapted for virtual teams using video conferencing platforms. Use the main screen for the “inner circle” speakers and have observers turn their cameras off or use a gallery view. The chat function can be used by observers to share thoughts or queue up to speak.

What should the facilitator do if the discussion stalls?

If the conversation lulls, the facilitator can re-engage the group by posing a follow-up question or asking a specific member of the inner circle for their thoughts. You could also invite someone from the outer circle to join the discussion if using an open-chair format.

How long should a fishbowl discussion last?

A typical fishbowl session can run from 20 to 30 minutes. This usually includes the introduction, one or two rounds of discussion (5-10 minutes each), and a final debrief. The duration should be adjusted based on the complexity of the topic and the size of the group.

Like this article on the “Fishbowl Discussion Activity”? Feel free to share your thoughts.