The Blame Game for Teams (With Variations & Debrief)
Do you want to conduct the blame game with your teams?
Blaming others is a natural human tendency. When things go wrong, our first instinct might be to find an external cause instead of looking inward. This activity, “The Blame Game,” uses this concept to foster accountability within teams. It helps members recognize this behavior and shift their focus toward ownership. By exploring this dynamic in a controlled setting, teams can build stronger foundations of trust and mutual respect.
In this article, let’s see how you can conduct this activity with your teams in the workplace.
Here is an overview of the sections in this article:
- Objective of The Blame Game
- 5 Variations of the exercise, including the classic version
- Tips for Successful Facilitation
- Frequently Asked Questions about the game
Objective of the Activity
This activity is designed to help teams move from a culture of blame to one of accountability. It provides a structured way to discuss a sensitive topic without direct confrontation.
Let’s explore the key objectives of running this exercise with your teams.
Promote Personal Accountability
The primary goal is to encourage individuals to take ownership of their actions and mistakes. It helps team members understand that pointing fingers is unproductive. Instead, they learn to ask, “What was my role in this, and what can I do differently next time?” This shift is fundamental to personal growth and team effectiveness.
Improve Problem-Solving Skills
When blame is the default response, the team’s energy is wasted on finding a scapegoat rather than a solution. This activity redirects that energy toward constructive problem-solving. Teams practice analyzing situations objectively, identifying root causes, and collaborating on effective fixes. This strengthens their ability to handle future challenges more efficiently.
Enhance Psychological Safety
A blame culture creates fear. Team members may hide mistakes to avoid criticism, which prevents the team from learning and improving. By normalizing discussions about errors in a safe space, this game helps build psychological safety. It reinforces the idea that it’s okay to be imperfect as long as the team learns from the experience.
Strengthen Team Cohesion
Constantly blaming one another erodes trust and damages relationships. This exercise helps repair and strengthen team bonds. When team members see their colleagues admitting faults and taking responsibility, it builds mutual respect. This shared vulnerability fosters a stronger sense of unity and shared purpose.
Develop Communication Skills
The activity provides a platform for honest and open dialogue. Participants practice articulating their perspectives without being accusatory. They also learn to listen empathetically to their peers. These debrief discussions are crucial for developing the communication habits needed for high-performing teams.
5 Variations of The Blame Game
Here are 5 variations of the Blame Game that you can use with your teams.
#1. The Classic Version
This version directly addresses instances of blame by having participants reflect on their own past behaviors. It serves as a foundation for understanding personal accountability.
Time: 10-20 minutes
Materials: Pen and paper for each participant
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Ask each person to write down a specific instance where they blamed someone else for a mistake they made.
- Invite each participant to read their written instance to the group without naming real people. For instance, a person might say, “I blamed a colleague for a missed deadline when I had not sent them the required information on time.”
- After each person shares, the group listens without judgment or comment.
- Once everyone has shared, facilitate a discussion about the common themes and feelings associated with blaming others.
Debrief
- What did it feel like to admit a time you misplaced blame?
- How does shifting blame impact a team’s ability to solve problems?
- What is one thing you can do to take more ownership in the future, and why?
#2. The “What If” Scenario
This variation uses hypothetical situations to explore blame and accountability in a less personal way. It is great for teams that are new to discussions about sensitive topics.
Time: 15-20 minutes
Materials: Pre-written scenario cards
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Prepare cards with short, work-related scenarios where something went wrong. For example, “A major client presentation contains the wrong data, and the mistake is discovered just minutes before the meeting.”
- Divide participants into smaller groups and give each group one scenario card.
- Ask each group to discuss the scenario and map out the “blame chain” that could happen. They should identify who might blame whom.
- Instruct the groups to then re-imagine the scenario with a focus on solutions. They should outline a response based on accountability and teamwork.
Debrief
- Which was easier: creating the blame chain or the solution path? Why?
- What is the difference in outcomes between a blame-focused response and a solution-focused one?
- How can we apply the solution-focused approach to our real-life challenges?
#3. The Responsibility Chain
This activity visually demonstrates how responsibility is shared across a team. It helps shift the perspective from individual fault to collective ownership.
Time: 10-15 minutes
Materials: A ball of yarn
Participants: 4-8 people per group
Instructions
- Ask each team to stand in a circle. The facilitator starts by holding the ball of yarn.
- The facilitator describes a simple mistake. For instance, “A social media post went out with a typo.” They then pass the ball of yarn to someone else in the circle while holding onto the end of the string.
- The person who receives the yarn must state one way they could have contributed to the mistake or helped prevent it. For example, “I could have offered to double-check the copy before it was scheduled.”
- The process continues, with each person sharing a point of responsibility and passing the yarn, creating a web that connects everyone.
Debrief
- What does the final yarn web represent to you?
- How did this exercise change your perspective on single-point failures?
- In what ways do our roles on the team interconnect every day?
#4. The Positive Blame Game
This twist flips the script by focusing on positive outcomes instead of mistakes. It encourages team members to recognize and acknowledge each other’s contributions.
Time: 10-15 minutes
Materials: None
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Ask each person to think of a recent team success.
- One by one, each participant “blames” another team member for that success.
- The person “blaming” must state a specific action the other person took that led to the positive result. For instance, “I’m blaming Sarah for our successful project launch because her detailed project plan kept us all on track.”
- The person who is “blamed” simply says “Thank you”, and then it is the next person’s turn.
Debrief
- How did it feel to be “blamed” for something positive?
- Why is it often easier to place blame for negative outcomes than for positive ones?
- What can we do to recognize each other’s positive contributions more often?
#5. The Anonymous Problem-Solving
This version allows team members to bring up real issues without fear of personal judgment. It focuses the group’s energy entirely on finding solutions.
Time: 15-20 minutes
Materials: Index cards and a box or hat
Participants: 3-8 people per group
Instructions
- Give each team member an index card and ask them to write down a recent work problem or mistake without using any names.
- Collect all the cards in a box or hat, and mix them up.
- Draw one card at a time and read the problem aloud to the teams. For example, “Communication on Project X has been unclear, leading to missed steps.”
- Each team then discusses the problem and brainstorms practical solutions, focusing only on the issue itself.
Debrief
- What was helpful about discussing these problems anonymously?
- Did you notice any common themes in the problems submitted? If so, why?
- What systems can we create to address these types of issues proactively?
Tips for Successful Facilitation
Running an activity about blame can be challenging. A skilled facilitator is key to ensuring the experience is constructive and psychologically safe.
Here are some tips to help you guide your teams successfully.
Establish Clear Ground Rules
Before you begin, set the stage for a safe and respectful conversation. The most important rule is to avoid using real names or pointing fingers at specific people in the room. Other rules could include “listen to understand, not to respond,” “assume good intent,” and “what is shared in the room stays in the room.” Writing these rules on a whiteboard can serve as a helpful reminder for everyone throughout the session.
Model Vulnerability
As the facilitator, your behavior sets the tone. Start the activity by sharing a personal example of a time you wrongly blamed someone or made a mistake. This act of vulnerability shows that it is safe for others to do the same. It transforms the exercise from a theoretical discussion into a genuine human experience, making participants more comfortable opening up.
Focus on Learning, Not Fault
Consistently steer the conversation away from who was wrong and toward what can be learned. Use framing questions that encourage forward-thinking. For instance, instead of asking “Whose fault was this?” ask “What can we learn from this situation?” or “How can we prevent this from happening again?” This focus keeps the discussion productive and aligned with the activity’s objectives.
Manage the Group Dynamics
Pay close attention to the emotional temperature of the room. If a discussion becomes too heated or personal, gently intervene. You can pause the conversation, remind the group of the ground rules, or redirect the focus back to the activity’s structure. Ensure that everyone has a chance to speak and that more dominant personalities do not overshadow quieter team members.
End with Actionable Commitments
A successful activity should lead to tangible change. At the end of the debrief, guide the team toward making specific commitments. This could be an agreement to implement a new process, a promise to practice more open communication, or a personal pledge to take ownership. Ask the team, “Based on our discussion, what is one small thing we can commit to doing differently starting tomorrow?” This turns insights into action and makes the exercise truly impactful.
Want Some Unique Leadership Development Activities?
If you want some unique activities to equip your employees (both in-person and virtual) with leadership skills, qualities, and mindset, you can get my premium e-book:
Or Want Some Unique Team Building Activities?
If you want some unique activities for your employees (both in-person and virtual), you can get my premium e-book:
Final Words
The Blame Game and its variations are powerful tools for any team. They help transform a culture of finger-pointing into one of shared accountability. By practicing these exercises, teams learn to communicate more openly about mistakes. They build trust, improve their problem-solving skills, and create a safer work environment. Ultimately, embracing accountability is not about avoiding errors, but about learning from them together to become a stronger, more resilient team.
FAQ: The Blame Game
You might have these questions in mind.
What if my team is resistant to this activity?
If your team is hesitant, start with a low-risk variation like “The What If Scenario” or “The Positive Blame Game.” These versions feel less personal and can help build trust. Explaining the goal is to improve processes, not to single anyone out, can also ease concerns.
How often should we do this activity?
This depends on your team’s needs. You could use it weekly or monthly as a general health check-up. You might also use it on an ad-hoc basis after a challenging project or when you notice a pattern of blame emerging. The key is to use it as a tool for proactive team development.
Can this activity be done with a remote team?
Yes, all variations can be adapted for a virtual setting. You can use digital whiteboards for brainstorming, chat features for anonymous submissions, and breakout rooms for small group discussions. The core principles of facilitation, like setting ground rules and modeling vulnerability, remain just as important online.
Is there a risk this activity could make things worse?
If facilitated poorly, there is a risk. It is crucial to establish psychological safety and enforce a “no names” rule strictly. If the conversation devolves into actual blaming, the facilitator must step in immediately. Then, they should refocus the group on learning and solutions.
What is the ideal group size for this exercise?
The ideal size is a small group of 3 to 8 people. This allows everyone a chance to participate fully in the discussion. If your team is larger, consider splitting them into smaller breakout groups to ensure the conversation remains intimate and effective.
Like this article on “The Blame Game”? Feel free to share your thoughts.
